Ten Questions Politicians Won’t Answer
From National Review by Tom Coburn - Senator from Oklahoma
While I have confidence in the American people to come up with their own probing questions, let me suggest a few questions that my own colleagues have been loath to answer:
1. Why do we need to increase spending on health care by at least $1.6 trillion and steal prosperity from our children and grandchildren when we spend nearly twice per person what other industrialized nations spend on health care?
In my view, any bill that increases spending is a failure and not serious reform. The problem is not that we don’t spend enough on health care, but that we don’t allocate resources efficiently and get value for what we pay.
2. What programs will you cut and whose taxes will you raise to pay for health-care reform?
Any politician — Republican or Democrat — who refuses to answer this question or avoids the topic by deferring to the committees of jurisdiction doesn’t deserve to be in office.
3. What earmarks or pet projects that you have sponsored will you sacrifice to help finance the cost of health-care reform?
It is immoral, in my view, to ask taxpayers to make more sacrifices while politicians practice business-as-usual pork-barrel politics.
4. Will you vote for a public option that requires taxpayer-funded abortion?
The current version of the so-called reform bill requires taxpayer-funded abortion. In the House, this fact prompted 19 pro-life Democrats to send a letter of protest to Speaker Pelosi. In the Senate, an amendment by Barbara Mikulski (D., Md.) that would require taxpayer-funded abortion passed in committee. Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) objected and voted no, saying, “The way it [the Mikulski amendment] is written could be interpreted down the road to include something like abortion.” Are these Democrats also part of the right-wing scare-tactic conspiracy?
5. If the public option is so wonderful, will you lead by example and vote for a plan to enroll you and your family in the public option?
I offered an amendment in committee to force members of Congress to enroll in the public option. Nine out of eleven Democrats on the health committee who back the public option refused. If the politicians creating the public option don’t have confidence in it, neither should the American people.
6. Will you vote for a plan that will allow a board of politicians and bureaucrats to override decisions made by you and your doctor?
Both the Senate and House bills set up a government-run “comparative effectiveness” board that will make final decisions about treatment and care. In committee, I gave senators several opportunities to accept language that would forbid this board from denying care. All of my amendments were rejected, which suggests that the intent is to set up a board that will ration care, as is done in the United Kingdom.
7. If you support a “comparative effectiveness” board, what qualifies you, as a politician, to practice medicine? Have you delivered health care to a single person, much less entire classes of people you claim to represent, such as the poor, the uninsured, or children?
I’m one of two physicians in the Senate, along with John Barrasso of Wyoming. I know for a fact that very few leaders in this debate have any firsthand experience or knowledge of health care, which is disturbing.
8. How will a government-run public option perform better than other failing government programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Indian Health Care?
Forty percent of doctors refuse to accept Medicaid patients because the program is broken. Access to a government program — such as the public option — does not guarantee access to health care.
9. If increasing spending on health care was the solution, why hasn’t it worked yet?
The public-option “reform” is not new at all but an extension of 1960s-era public policies that say a little more government spending and intervention is always the answer.
10. Are you more committed to doing reform right or quickly? Would you consider backing a thoughtful alternative to the public option? If so, which one?
I’ve introduced a bill along with Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) and Reps. Paul Ryan (R., Wisc.) and Devin Nunes (R., Calif.) called the Patient’s Choice Act that guarantees coverage and choice for every American without raising taxes or increasing spending. In fact, our bill will save taxpayers at least $70 billion. Many other members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, are working on alternatives that don’t herd the American people into a government-run program.
The choice is not between the public option and nothing. The choice is between the public option and an option that can win the support of the public. The future of health care truly is up to you.
— Dr. Tom Coburn (R.) is a U.S. senator from Oklahoma. (Click on bold headline for complete story)
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Is This Barry's Kenyan Cert?
Since the Congress has collectively chosen to accept some Hawaiian's verbal that she's seen Barry's stateside birth cert, I feel it is my patriotic duty to accept an attorney's claim that the cert in the above photo is the real birth certificate from Kenya. Makes sense to me. I'm OK with it too!Like I've always said, all I ask of this president is not financial bailouts, free government run healthcare, or even a highly paid do-nothing, unaccountable assignment with ACORN. All I want is his birth certificate. That's all I ask.
A hat tip to both Orly and Joe! The principal responses oughta be marvelous! Interestingly, the Clinton campaign couldn't find such material leading up to the election. Of course, that same bunch couldn't find her Rose Law Firm billing records for two full years all the while under subpoena either.
Let's see how quickly Dan Rather weighs in on this one. If we find out it is a fabrication, I'll opt for this one as offical instead of that forgery sitting in the Hawaiian vaults.
(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Monday, July 27, 2009
Dems say we can't call it "Government Run Healthcare."

Dems say "Republicans cannot call it 'Government Run Healthcare.' You can't. You just can't. We object. So, we're canceling your postal privileges as well!"
In other words, congressional members are not allowed to advise their constituency of impending legislation. Reminds me of censorship. Doesn't it to you?
(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Saturday, June 6, 2009
Lest Anyone Forget...
Wading ashore June 6, 1944, on the coast of France under heavy Nazi machine-gun fire, were these American soldiers, shown just as they left the ramp of a Coast Guard Higgins landing boat. The operation at Omaha Beach involved 50,000 men and was part of the largest single-day amphibious invasion in history. D-Day casualties at Omaha numbered around 5,000, most in the first few hours.This entire impactful episode miraculously slipped our President's mind when he vainly tired to recall what America has contributed to our world today during an Islam-praising speech in Cairo.
May you spare a moment today to remember the sacrifices of those who have gone before us, this 65th anniversary of Operation Overlord, the allied invasion on the beaches at Normandy, June 6th, 1944.
Labels:
beaches,
Coast Guard,
Eisenhower,
Europe,
France,
History,
Normandy Landings,
Omaha Beach,
United States,
United States Army,
USA,
World War II,
WWII
Friday, June 5, 2009
lil' barry and the Muslims
Wesley Pruden, editor emeritus of The Washington Times, writes in his column appearing in today's featured story, 'Mr. Obama's revelation of his "inner Muslim" in Cairo reveals much about who he is. He is our first president without an instinctive appreciation of the culture, history, tradition, common law and literature whence America sprang.'To which I would reply, "Well, this is understandable because lil' barry's a Kenyan, and a muslim. The USA is anathema to both he and his wife. I would also ad that barry simply does not like our country. That's become obvious. Not illegal, mind you, but clearly obvious."
(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Labels:
Barack Obama,
barry soetoro,
Cairo,
Egypt,
islam,
Muslim,
muslims,
obama,
pruden,
saudi arabia,
traitor,
United States,
Washington Times,
wesley pruden
Monday, May 11, 2009
Print Media And the New Ad Frontier

We're experiencing a paradigm shift in how our populace gets their information, advertises, and conducts their commerce. Newsprint, magazines, and hard copy flyers are rendered "time-wise archaic" by immediate online applications such as Drudge, Twitter, and Facebook at the personal level, LocalAdLink at the business level, and I-Supply at the consumer level. How are you adapting?
(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)