Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Welcome to the GoYoli Video Tour


Catch these new updated introductory videos about Yoli, the newest venture in Blast Cap delivered nutrition. 10 calories via the "freshest" delivery of vitamins and enzymes, no preservatives or added sugars.

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Friday, December 11, 2009

Open Letter to Senator Nelson (D-FL)


Senator Bill Nelson,

I need clarification on what weaponry, concealed or otherwise, I can legally carry to my voting precinct during the next election to combat Black Panther intimidation behavior if encountered in Florida. Since the incident in Pennsylvania was virtually dismissed by the US Attorney General, I'm assuming it is lawful and acceptable behavior to visit the voting booth fully armed.

Have you gone on record with the US Civil Rights Commission inquiring about this incident? How about an inquiry with the Justice Department or the US Attorney’s Office? And, what was their response?

I include the article concerning the Justice Department dismissal of what appears to be blatant voter intimidation.

The Washington Times
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther

Rarely does the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights vote unanimously on anything.

A partisan divide has made the commission contentious in recent years. Yet the Department of Justice's decision to forfeit its voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and three individual defendants drew a 6-0 vote with one abstention by the commission. What unified the commission was outrage at the Justice Department for letting the Black Panthers off the hook.
The Civil Rights Commission has sent two letters -- on June 16 and June 22 -- to Loretta King, acting assistant attorney general for the civil rights division, asking for an explanation, but it has not received a response. Rep. Frank R. Wolf, Virginia Republican, sent a June 8 letter demanding an explanation, but the congressman told us he has yet to receive an answer from the department one month later.
The Civil Rights Commission's first letter expressed its "great confusion" over the department's decision. After all, "defendants were caught on video blocking access to the polls, and physically threatening and verbally harassing voters during the November 4, 2008 general election." The video showed "one of them actually brandished a nightstick in plain view of voters and poll observers ... defendants 'made statements containing racial threats and racial insults.' "
The commission's letter quoted "Veteran of the civil rights movement, Bartle Bull" calling the defendants' actions "the most blatant form of voter intimidation I have encountered in my life in political campaigns in many states, even going back to the work I did in Mississippi in the 1960s."
The commission summed up the case in its June 16 letter to Ms. King: "Though it had basically won the case ... the [Department of Justice's Civil Rights] Division took the unusual move of voluntarily dismissing the charges .... In its notice of dismissal, the Division cites as its rationale only the fact that defendants failed to appear and respond ... the Division's public rationale would send the wrong message entirely - that attempts at voter suppression will be tolerated and will not be vigorously prosecuted so long as the groups or individuals who engage in them fail to respond to the charges leveled against them."

Lenore Ostrowsky, a commission spokesman, told us, "It is rare for a letter from the commission over the last four years to be sent out without any dissent." There's good reason for today's unanimity. One of the Black Panther defendants, Jerry Jackson, is an elected member of Philadelphia's 14th Ward Democratic Committee and was a credentialed poll watcher for Barack Obama and the Democratic Party when the intimidation occurred. We agree with the concern at the Civil Rights Commission. The Justice Department needs to explain why it is not pursuing charges against these thugs.
- end of article

Again, have you gone on record with the US Civil Rights Commission inquiring about this incident? How about an inquiry with the Justice Department or the US Attorney’s Office? And, what was their response?

Please advise what your Senate office has determined concerning this miscarriage of justice. Why have charges been dropped? Who's going to jail and what fines have been levied? And, if no punishment was meted out, what weaponry can I legally carry during the next election to protect myself against such thuggery if encountered in the State of Florida?

Jeff Wahlen - Orlando, FL 32832

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BemSmTNDxU
(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Yoli: The Solution



(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Monday, November 2, 2009

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Media Ignores ACORN Nuggets

Mainstream Media Ignores Juicy ACORN Nuggets
Hannah Giles
Wednesday, October 28, 2009

The “Pimp and Pro” story, exposing ACORN’s willingness to advise a prostitute on tax evasion and child sex trafficking, hit America a few weeks ago. There were a myriad number of angles to report, yet the Mainstream Media's favorite approach seems to be the method in which James O’Keefe and I orchestrated and gathered the information.

It’s like going fishing, but instead of taking a picture and raving about the 750lb Mako shark you caught, you blather on about the bait that was used.

What happens when people get bored? They stop paying attention. What happens when people stop paying attention to an already suffering press industry? We’re seeing that happen now.

Rather than simply complaining about the MSM’s negligence on the story, here are some loose ends the media ignored, from our footage alone, that warrant attention.

With regard to the children:

• Baltimore- Why no mention of the toddlers that were in the room while James and I were being counseled on how to manage our underage prostitution ring?

• San Bernardino- The content of this video was largely ignored except for the part where ACORN worker Tresa Kaelke mentions she shot her husband. What about when she told us not to educate our sex-slaves because they won’t want to work for us? Or when we talked about making money off of clients who would physically abuse the girls? What about the whole transport-the-girls-in-a-school-bus-to-avoid-suspicion discussion?

Attention to the masses:

• Washington, DC- Why were we counseled by ACORN during a first time homebuyer’s seminar, while 30-40 other first time homebuyers sat crammed in a hot room?

• Brooklyn- This office was swarmed with people, busy staff members and a full waiting room. Did we take our number and wait in line? Nope. Why were we given the private attention of three ACORN staffers when clearly more deserving and less intrusive (and even possibly law-abiding!) clients patiently waited?

The political games:

• San Bernardino: What happened to the list of politicians that Ms. Kaelke rattled off when she spoke of her ACORN office’s community involvement and influence? Has anyone set out to uncover just how close these politicians’ relationships are with the San Bernardino ACORN? Does anyone even remember the names?

• San Diego: Has anyone questioned why ACORN employee Juan Carlos would want to help smuggle girls across the Mexican border right after an ACORN-sponsored immigration parade???

• Philadelphia: Why did the Philly office go into damage control mode as soon as the Baltimore story first broke? What do they have to hide?

I would hate to be known as the journalist who never saw the bigger picture, lacked the creativity and ambition to approach a story from a fresh perspective, and contributed to the apathy of an entire nation. And I honestly, from the bottom of my heart, think every wannabe and professional journalist has the same attitude.

So why aren’t they behaving accordingly? Fear? Comfort? A false sense of purpose?

I don’t know about the rest of the press corps but all of the above scenarios scream scandal to me. They'd be worthwhile news.



(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Convergence!

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Bipartisan Baloney


The IBD skewers any notion that the Baucus Grand Government Healthcare Takeover proposal is somehow bipartisan.

Bipartisan Baloney

Health Reform: As predicted, the Democrats are using the vote of one very liberal Republican as proof their health care takeover is "bipartisan." It's nothing of the sort. But then, we're getting used to such exaggerations.

To ensure passage even in a Congress where they have an overwhelming, veto-proof majority, the Democrats have used deceit and outright lies to make their case. Calling the Baucus health overhaul "bipartisan" simply because Republican-in-name-only Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine opted to vote for the bill is just one example.

Snowe in fact is more liberal than most of Blue Dog Democrats, some of whom have shown the wisdom to object to the nationalization of 17% of the U.S. economy.

Before Baucus, she voted for the bogus $787 billion "stimulus" package that's done nothing for our economy but promise to send our children into perpetual debtor status. So in one year, she voted to expand our deficit by a minimum $1.5 trillion in the next decade.

Bipartisan? Democrat Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut says he won't vote for the bill's passage, as it stands now. Nor will Democratic Sen. Jay Rockefeller. He objects to taxes on high-income health care recipients — who happen to include, believe it or not, many coal miners in his home state of West Virginia.

Doesn't that show opposition to the bill is more bipartisan?

And what about the 158 House Democrats who, like Rockefeller, won't vote for the Senate bill if it includes the 40% tax on so-called "Cadillac" health care plans — supposedly a tax on "the rich," but in reality one that will hammer the job-creating entrepreneurs in many Democratic districts.

As for Snowe and her fellow Maine Republican, Susan Collins, their possible embrace of the Baucus bill doesn't make it bipartisan either. Heck, they aren't even "moderate," as the media have described them. They're liberal. And that's not merely an opinion.

The American Conservative Union scores legislators on a number of key votes to gauge how conservative or liberal they are. Here's what the ACU had to say about its 2008 tally: "For the first time, two Republicans scored as absolutely liberal in voting."

The two? Snowe, with a score of 20%, and Collins, at 12% — more liberal even than then-Sen. Barack Obama, who scored 17%. Not surprisingly, Collins says she may also back the Baucus bill.

No, none of this is "bipartisan" in the least. But that's par for the course in this debate, where so many outright falsities masquerade as truths.


(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

A Letter To Tommy B.


Author Jeffrey Lord makes the finest case for media bias ever! Here's the sorry state of today's Old Media in a nutshell.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
story by Jeffrey Lord

Media Malpractice: Tom Brokaw's World Implodes

Tom Brokaw.

With the passing of Walter Cronkite, Mr. Brokaw is considered perhaps the new "dean" of journalism. As such the former NBC News anchor is periodically summoned forth to assess the current world, an occasion that presented itself recently on the venerable NBC Sunday newser Meet the Press.

Sitting cheek by jowl with New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, Brokaw joined him to riff on the Internet and the state of journalism today, an opportunity occasioned by the resignation of Van Jones, he of the Truther brigades (and much more) and the Obama White House. Mr. Jones' resignation was prompted by a virtual parade of videos and documents in which Jones, in his own words and deeds, presented himself as an overripe Marxist with a tendency to the nutty paranoia of the extreme left. This material was discovered by Fox commentator Glenn Beck, doubtless with an assist from citizens who had scanned the Internet, easily unearthing Jones' ravings. One in particular was Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit.

The Meet the Press conversation with moderator David Gregory included the section below (from the transcript of the broadcast). It was prompted by the discussion of Mr. Jones' resignation:

MR. BROKAW: Well, I've -- one of the things I've been saying to audiences is this question comes up a lot, and a lot of people will repeat back to me and take it as face value something that they read on the Internet. And my line to them is you have to vet information. You have to test it the same way you do when you buy an automobile or when you go and buy a new flat-screen television. You read the Consumer Reports, you have an idea of what it's worth and what the lasting value of it is. You have to do the same thing with information because there is so much disinformation out there that it's frightening, frankly, in a free society that depends on information to make informed decisions. And this is across the board, by the way. It's not just one side of the political spectrum or the other. It is across the board, David, and it's something that we all have to address and it requires society and political and cultural leaders to stand up and say, "this is crazy." We just can't function that way.

Now, this is remarkable. Truly.

How to address the substance here? Perhaps a "letter to Tom Brokaw" format is most appropriate.

Dear Mr. Brokaw:

Recently you appeared on Meet the Press, discussing the issues of the day along with New York Times columnist Tom Friedman.

May I be candid?

You said that it was critical for people to "vet information… because there is so much disinformation out there that it's frightening, frankly, in a free society that depends on information to make informed decisions." Mr. Friedman then chimed in that the Internet is "an open sewer of untreated, unfiltered information."

With respect, I'd like to recount some history -- old and new -- with what is called these days the "Old Media," which is to say the three networks of ABC, CBS and your own home, NBC, and newspapers such as Mr. Friedman's, the New York Times (and the Washington Post, the newsmagazines etc) The stories below, while notable, are only the tip of this particular iceberg. They address the issue you have raised, that a free society "depends on information to make informed decisions."

* The President of the United States is known by the press who covers him -- but not the public - to be, how shall I say, a womanizer. He is having, among his flings, a toss with a woman who is also the mistress of Chicago Mafia boss Sam Giancana. This at the same time the president's brother, his former campaign manager, is Attorney General of the United States. Which is to say the head of the department of the executive branch charged with investigating the Mafia. Reporting from the Old Media? Zero. Zip. Mum's the word. Not an ounce of curiosity about anything or anybody that would lead to a mindboggling tangle of scandal, conflict-of-interest and serious misjudgment by the two most prominent government officials of the day.. The American people are in fact never informed of any of this until all but the mistress are long dead, in spite of the fact that the President's interests and his family's Chicago connections were well known by those who covered him. How and why could such a gross violation of basic journalism happen? As the late Teddy White, the Pulitzer Prize winning author of The Making of the President series, put it, JFK's "cultivation of the press colored all the reporting that came from the Kennedy campaign." Not to mention the Kennedy presidency that followed.

* In 1963 CBS executive Fred Friendly and CBS commentator Eric Sevareid convince Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater to sit for a two-hour interview for a proposed CBS documentary called "The Conservative Revival." Goldwater, wary that CBS was possessed of something he called "liberal bias," hesitated. But persuaded that Friendly and Sevareid were, in Goldwater's words, "gentlemen and men of their word," he went ahead with the interview. The result? A show called "Thunder on the Right," which focused on the John Birch Society, the Minutemen and, as Goldwater later delicately noted, other "far-right activists." Which is to say, crazies. A thoughtful profile of the likes of William F. Buckley, Jr. this show was not. Goldwater appeared on screen only briefly, just long enough to link him with the Birchers, a group with which he had not only no connection but had actively opposed. Said a burned Goldwater afterwards: "In view of their conduct, I would never again accept the word of Friendly or Sevareid."

* The year after JFK's murder, a beautiful young woman named Mary Meyer, the wife separated from CIA official Cord Meyer, is found shot to death along a canal towpath in Georgetown. She is the sister-in-law of JFK's close friend Ben Bradlee, then the Washington bureau chief of Newsweek, later famous as the executive editor of the Washington Post during Watergate. In the middle of this tragedy, Mr. Bradlee discovers an official from the CIA in his murdered sister-in-law's home rummaging through her belongings. It happens a second time. Then Mr. Bradlee discovers the object sought by the CIA -- Ms. Meyer's secret diary. The diary tells the startling tale of 20-30 get-togethers for sex with Bradlee's friend President Kennedy, where the two had occasion to smoke marijuana in between trysts. In the White House. Mr. Bradlee is stunned his buddy the president was sleeping with his own sister-in-law. He had no idea. Fair enough. But his reaction once he knew? To do his best to see that this explosive news story never sees the light of day, with the diary destroyed. In fact, the story does surface -- years later when a source who had seen the diary tips off the National Enquirer -- the National Enquirer! -- and Mr. Bradlee 'fesses up, very disturbed the story is out. He admits that, well, yes -- the story is true. Every word of it. Coverage at the time any of this actually happened -- which is to say the eve of the 1964 Johnson-Goldwater election? A point, you surely would agree, when Americans needed information to make what, in your words, would have been an "informed decision" on the Kennedy-Johnson administration record and also that of the Democratic candidate for Senator from New York -- Robert Kennedy. Zero. Why? The story was in Bradlee's hands -- the hands of the Washington bureau chief for one of the most influential newsmagazines of the day -- and, said he later: "I never for a minute considered reporting the discovery of the diary and its contents.

* On the verge of being nominated for president on the Republican ticket, Senator Barry Goldwater is, says CBS journalist Daniel Schorr, heading to Germany for a vacation after the GOP Convention. Germany? Why Germany? The trip was, said reporter Schorr, "a move by Senator Goldwater to link up" with the far right-wing of German politics. Meaning, of course, the Nazis. Goldwater would not only be consorting with these Nazis, he was scheduled to stay at Berchtesgaden, the infamous country estate of Adolf Hitler. In fact, Goldwater had no such plans. None. Zero. Zip. But it was a vivid story that successfully added a few brush strokes to the portrait the media and his opponents sought to create (as in the CBS "Thunder on the Right" documentary) that Barry Goldwater was a far-right wing extremist, a nut case. Said a still angry Goldwater decades later of the attempt to paint him as a Hitler-loving Nazi-sympathizer (Goldwater was a Major General in the U.S. Air Force Reserve and a World War Two veteran): "The CBS broadcast was false, and Schorr's was the most irresponsible reporting I've witnessed in my life. The New York Times followed with an untrue account of its own."

These events, Mr. Brokaw, are obviously "old news." So let's become a bit more current.

* President Clinton is discovered to be having an affair with a White House intern named Monica Lewinsky. Newsweek has the story but declines to run it. Just as Ben Bradlee declined to reveal the news of Mary Meyer's relationship with JFK. This time, the Internet comes into play, and the Drudge Report releases the story. All hell breaks loose. The President is impeached but not convicted.

* Former North Carolina Senator John Edwards runs for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. He receives wide praise as the husband standing by his cancer-stricken wife Elizabeth, a story line that is repeated in the Old Media from start to finish throughout his campaign. In reality, Edwards is conducting an affair with a videographer on his campaign staff named Rielle Hunter. She is pregnant. None of this is investigated by the Old Media -- but instead by the National Enquirer, which breaks the story in October, 2007, while Edwards is viewed as a serious candidate for the nomination rivaling Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Edwards and Ms. Hunter issue staunch denials, even as the Internet begins to pick up on the story. The Old Media ignores the story, with CBS's Bob Schieffer saying: "I believe that's a story that we will be avoiding, because it appears to me that there's absolutely nothing to it...This seems to be just sort of a staple of modern campaigns, that you got through at least one love child which turns out not to be a love child. And I think we can all do better than this one." By July of 2008, Edwards is out of the presidential race, but viewed as a serious candidate to be Attorney General of the United States in an Obama administration. The Enquirer updates the news, with a vivid story of confronting Edwards in a Los Angeles hotel as he paid a midnight visit to Ms. Hunter and her baby. Fox News pursues the story. The Drudge Report and the blogosphere is filled with the story. Glenn Beck suggests on his then-CNN show that Edwards sue the Enquirer if the story is false. Edwards denies all as "lies." By August of 2008, Edwards confesses, after six Fox News reports and multiple Internet stories, but denies he is the father of the child. The Old Media finally informs its audience of the truth, with Edwards giving an interview to ABC's Nightline. Recently, stories have surfaced from a Raleigh television station that Ms. Hunter is being moved to the Raleigh area and that Edwards will admit paternity. Mr. Edwards was so disgraced he didn't bother to attend the Democratic National Convention. Someone else is Attorney General in the Obama Administration.

* Van Jones is appointed the White House "Green Czar." As Kyle Smith of the New York Post has noted, Jones was profiled lovingly in the New Yorker, hailed as a "legendary figure" in the environmental movement by the Washington Post -- and none other than Mr. Friedman devoted four flattering pages to him in Friedman's book Hot, Flat, and Crowded. Yet suddenly Mr. Jones was ignored by the Old Media as the New Media uncovered his videotaped speeches and a paper trail proclaiming his Marxist sympathies, his support of a radical cop killer and his support of the nutty "Truther" movement that claims President Bush had a role in the 9/11 attacks. Not only does none of this make NBC -- your network -- or Mr. Friedman's New York Times -- even after Fox News, Mr. Beck and all manner of Internet sites are on the trail -- the story surfaces only when Mr. Jones has announced his resignation. A few minutes after midnight on Labor Day weekend Sunday. The story, as Mr. Smith points out, was purposely ignored, hoping it would go away. It didn't.

* Talk radio host Mark Levin authors Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto. The book takes off, riding the New York Times bestseller list at the number one spot for 12 weeks, and is still on the list for a 23rd week. At no time does your network -- or CBS or ABC -- call on Mr. Levin for the usual author's interview on network morning shows that one would expect for such a prominently selling book that issues a clarion political call. To this moment, the only Old Media institution to contact Mark Levin is the Philadelphia Inquirer -- the paper from the author's home area.

* Freelance film maker Jim O'Keefe and a young aspiring journalist named Hannah Giles, suspicious of the activities of ACORN, a controversial left-wing community organizing group under investigation in various states for voter fraud, set up a visit in the style of reporting pioneered by CBS's 60 Minutes. They return with considerable video that shows ACORN employees in Baltimore, Washington and Brooklyn scheming with the "prostitute" and "pimp" (the young journalists) to provide assistance in setting up a brothel, avoid federal taxes and employ underage girls from El Salvador in what amounts to sex slavery. Since ACORN has received millions of federal tax dollars over the years, and has been connected to President Obama in terms of his rise to prominence in Illinois politics, not to mention election activities while he was running for president, one would think this a major news story. Not for the Old Media. As reported by Glenn Beck a full two days after the story broke on Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com, here's the record of reports on this story:

Fox News -- 19
CNN -- 3
MSNBC -- 0
ABC -- 0
CBS - 0
NBC -- 0
New York Times -- 1 (an AP story)
Washington Post -- 1 (an AP story)

As a result of the O'Keefe, Giles, Breitbart, Beck, Hannity and Fox reporting, the U.S. Bureau of the Census has now severed its connection with ACORN, and four ACORN employees have been fired.

So let's go back to your remarks, Mr. Brokaw, and those of Mr. Friedman.

Americans have learned the hard way that there was and is a serious effort by some of the most powerful figures in American journalism to quite deliberately keep Americans from making "informed decisions" by denying them accurate information. By ignoring major news stories. By not reporting stories that were or are at variance with liberal politics, as if, like Mary Meyer's diary or John Edwards' affair with Rielle Hunter or Van Jones' speeches or ACORN's scandals or Mark Levin's book they simply didn't exist.

Or, if the subject was someone like a Goldwater, not simpatico with the journalist's personal political beliefs, sticking it to the target with the editor's scissors. Thus, when it came to stories like the Goldwater/Nazi story or the Goldwater/Bircher story -- presto! -- these false stories are, to use your term of art, "vetted" to deliberately mis-portray their subject..

What's particularly interesting is that the stories not reported about JFK were in the early 1960s, the effort to not report the story about President Clinton was in 1998, the story on John Edwards was hushed through the time it counted most, in the election cycle of 2008 when he was a serious presidential candidate, and the decision not to report on Van Jones was -- well -- two weeks ago, and ACORN but last week. Which is to say, September of 2009.

In other words, across five decades of American journalistic history, the instinct of many Old Media institutions -- specifically including NBC and the New York Times -- has been to deliberately withhold the truth. To quite deliberately use their journalism skills and tools to misrepresent those whose politics they do not favor.

Were this, say, the field of medicine, practitioners of this kind of thing would lose their license to practice, sued for and surely convicted of malpractice. As it is, the examples listed here are what might be termed "media malpractice," evidencing a clear and convincing pattern of deceit.

Yet all through this period, a curious fact keeps surfacing. In 1951, a young man named William F. Buckley, Jr. burst on the national scene with a book called God and Man at Yale. The book took on a serious topic -- the institutional mores of Yale University, Buckley's alma mater -- and challenged them head on. In what was then groundbreaking work, Buckley highlighted what today would be called the secularization of a college supposedly devoted to the religious and capitalistic principles of its founders.

The reaction from liberals of the day was utter fury. Young Mr. Buckley was excoriated as a fascist and would-be Nazi. Yet the book sold like hotcakes, flashing onto the bestseller lists of the day and catapulting Buckley, at 25, to political and intellectual celebrity, setting him on a course for his remarkable life.

In 1961, Senator Goldwater penned a book called The Conscience of a Conservative. This time, unlike the outraged treatment of the Buckley book, the Goldwater book would just be ignored by those who, in Goldwater's later words, "had long held a monopoly on the information flowing to the American people." Yet just as with Buckley's book, and this time without the publicity, a book that had a first printing of ten thousand copies eventually soared to four million copies sold. The book, now considered a classic, is still in print today.

Let's focus for a moment on Mark Levin and his mysterious lack of welcome at your network and the rest. Without so much as a nod from the Old Media, Mr. Levin's Liberty and Tyranny, a "pro-conservative" book vigorously positive in tone like those of Buckley and Goldwater before him, soars onto the bestseller list and just stays there. Like the Buckley and Goldwater books, the Levin book is a seminal work on conservatism itself that stands out from the conservative crowd, a classic and deeply serious look at political philosophy as expressed in the politics of our day. It is not a romance novel, not a Grisham or Dan Brown thriller, which makes its popularity (currently a stunning 1.2 million books in print -- almost four times that of other bestselling conservative-themed books combined) and that of the book's author an extraordinary story at any time, most particularly in the Age of Obama. As the Culture and Media Institute notes, Levin's book was number one on the bestseller list of Mr. Friedman's paper for 12 weeks. It is now in its 23rd week on the list. Yet just as with Goldwater's 1961 book or with 1960s JFK stories, or a 1990s Clinton story or an Edwards or Van Jones or ACORN story from 2008 and 2009 -- the established media does its best to bury the whole unpleasantness to liberals that is Levin's book and its huge popularity, precisely because it is such a potent challenge to their world view.

Mr. Friedman's own book managed the number one spot on the list for a mere two weeks -- not even close to Levin - yet Friedman had the media red carpet rolled out for him. Elizabeth Edwards managed only one week atop the Times list, but she too got the media red carpet treatment. As the CMI story also points out, this media blackout applies to other conservative authors as well, although when prodded by Drudge and reports that Ann Coulter has been banned from the Today Show, she appears. Challenged, of course, in a fashion liberal authors never face, a problem faced as well by bestselling conservative authors like Dick Morris. "Stirring" was one of Matt Lauer's comments to Elizabeth Edwards when she appeared to promote her book -- and that was only about one paragraph. Ann Coulter gets complaints about her "tone." One gets the feeling Lauer is simply too intimidated by either the subject matter or the author to question Levin.

Mr. Brokaw, all of this history, old and new, is now frankly irrelevant. What's done is done. What once was a considerable reservoir of trust and respect has been drained bone dry.

The real point here is that by the grace of the hard work of a number of people, the world has changed in regard to this kind of thing. Specifically this includes people like Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes of Fox News, along with their stars like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Greta Van Susteren and Neil Cavuto, to cite but five of a long roster. Not for nothing Rush Limbaugh's description of himself as "America's Real Anchorman," a description with which millions agree -- with considerable reason. So too are other talk radio stars Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, Laura Ingraham and their local and regional counterparts filling this news void. Add in the late Mr. Buckley and his National Review, R. Emmett Tyrrell and Alfred Regnery of The American Spectator, Regnery's late father Henry, who founded the influential Regnery Publishing, and Bill Kristol and Fred Barnes over at the Weekly Standard. And others, such as the indefatigable columnist-blogger (HotAir.com)-author Michelle Malkin, whose book Culture of Corruption is now itself atop the Times list. A list where Dick Morris's Catastrophe sits as well as does Bill O'Reilly's Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity -- the latter now for 44 weeks. Surely irritating at the moment is Beck's Common Sense, number one on the paperback NYT list.

But most importantly of all, perhaps, there is the growing number of citizen journalists like Matt Drudge, the godfather of this field with his Drudge Report. Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit, who surfaced some of the Van Jones story. John Hinderaker, Scott Johnson and Paul Mirengoff at Power Line, where Dan Rather's Bush National Guard story was exposed as a phony. The ACORN story is courtesy of Andrew Breitbart and his new site BigGovernment.com, and as mentioned young filmmaker Jim O'Keefe and Hannah Giles, who did the investigating grunt work. There are now countless Americans with access to the Internet of which you are so wary, any number of whom are doing a better job at informing Americans than NBC News or the New York Times.

It is because of these people and their institutions that stories about President Clinton, John Edwards, Van Jones and ACORN have had considerably different endings then they surely would have had if the country had to depend on your Old Media. Why? Because the Old Media is not about the "news," it is about promoting liberalism, using access to ink and air time to convince Americans that "that's the way it is," to borrow the late Mr. Cronkite's famous phrase. When in fact the news as delivered -- or should I say undelivered -- by the establishment media was and still is really about the personal political agenda of its liberal journalists. The Old Media has lost all pretension to being the umpire. It is the batter -- and the pitcher, infield and outfield players as well.

The Internet, talk radio and Fox have collectively if independently wound up as the battering ram that has smashed through the castle gates of Big Liberal Media.

As a result, the media world in which you played such an important role is imploding before our eyes.

Like the last reel of a James Bond movie, the good guys are swarming the bad guy's lair and rigging it with explosives. Explosives called "the facts" or, better yet, "the truth."

The real vetting in the Van Jones incident was not done to Van Jones, Mr. Brokaw. The real vetting was of your establishment colleagues. It is they who have been collectively vetted in this latest incident, and one more time Americans have concluded, to quote you, "this is crazy." The news media they and you represent simply cannot be trusted to tell the truth.

The investigation of Mr. Jones -- a government official no less -- is but one example of the competition your colleagues now must face every minute of every day. The investigation into the corruption in ACORN is still one more. So too with the Bush National Guard story. Not to mention the real details of the President's health care plans. The response to Mark Levin's book -- and the importance of that response, in spite of a virtual blackout from your peers -- is, in its quite distinctive fashion, yet another.

In truth? Either you really don't get all this -- or you do, and simply can't bring yourself to admit the fact. Much less do anything about it.

What do I think? I think you're a really smart guy, and so are your colleagues.

Which is exactly what troubles me.

Thanks for your time.


Jeffrey Lord is a former Reagan White House political director and author. He writes from Pennsylvania at jlpa1@aol.com.

(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Friday, September 11, 2009

The Theory is Now a Conspiracy...

This is too convenient! Could it possibly be that the DNC understood Barry's lack of constitutional qualifications and altered their own party's Official Certification of Nomination Form to accommodate fraud? It took the Canadian Press to uncover this one.

The Mistake, The Evidence, Obama is NOT a constitutional president

A hat tip to J.B Williams.

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

The Media Can't Be Bothered

Much of America has started to realize that not only was Mr. Obama not vetted before he became president, he and his fellow unvetted cohorts continue to be given a pass by the Fourth Estate.

Two more stories demonstrate how the Democrat-Media Complex, the natural alliance of the Democratic Party and the mainstream media, is more concerned with trying to figure out how to destroy Glenn Beck - "he's nuts!" - than to follow his methodical, accurate reporting. This dynamic - used against all potent critics and off-the-reservation journalists - shows that not only is the media ignoring all the negative things coming out about the Obama administration, it is acting like President Richard Nixon's henchmen, making life difficult for its whistleblowers.

One of the stories is that ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, a massive radical organization, is poised to receive billions from the Obama "stimulus."

ACORN's voting division is currently under investigation in multiple states for fraud. And its housing division exists to fulfill an unclear mandate that has been accused of using funds to pay for political protests. If the alternative media digs further and finds out ACORN is guilty as charged, and as corrupt as its ample critics say it is, the onus is those who didn't question when the Obama team (and Congress!) decided to allocate billions to expand the group's reach.

Brian Williams, and all your dozing buds, the ball is in your court.

Breitbart: Couric Should Look In The Mirror


(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

The Gathering Storm


From today's Lucianne.com
Artwork by Ward Dorrity and he deserves a hat tip! Click on photo to enlarge.

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Perhaps this may explain some of the outrage at townhalls...

( JESSICA HILL/ASSOCIATED PRESS / August 31, 2009 )

House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, far right, speaks while colleagues play solitaire on their computers as the House convenes to vote on a new budget for the fiscal year in the Capitol, in Hartford, Conn., Monday, Aug., 31, 2009. Courteous and attentive, aren't they?

Lest we forget, all of these sojourners are on the clock!

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Ted Kennedy’s legacy not as heroic as some might think...hint: Chappaquiddick



Edward "Ted" Kennedy, a fraud of a statesman, is now gone. Yes, rest in peace and all that, but for me his death ends a bitterness which I've harbored most of my life, and for that I'm glad it's over.

I was 15 when Chappaquiddick surfaced as an insignificant Saturday evening story relegated to the inner pages of most of the nation's afternoon newspapers (two dailies were common back then, a morning paper and an evening edition such as the Milwaukee Sentinel and the Milwaukee Journal). Conveniently for Kennedy, this was the same weekend of Apollo 11's manned lunar landing which attracted virtually all the media coverage for days on end. The ultimate fulfillment of JFK's goal of landing a man on the moon by the end of the decade unanimously overshadowed drivel like a curiously upended Oldsmobile in Poucha Pond and an unfortunate "drowning." After all, Friday night drunk-driving stories were not all that uncommon back in the days before breathalyzers came into being.

Without lauding the accomplishments and shortcomings of his two older brothers JFK and RFK, allow me to indisputably say that "Theodore" failed to uphold the inspiring Kennedy aura. The kid brother's expulsion for cheating at Harvard was one thing, but a life supposedly dedicated to championing for the little guy all the while exploiting the protective double standard of aristocracy in America was the utmost in hypocrisy. Regarding Chappaquiddick, as for Kennedy emerging virtually unscathed both physically and in reputation, the rest of us would still be in jail.

Therefore, my youthful faith, trust, and belief in politicians was forever shattered. The pantheon of respectables like Dwight D. Eisenhower and JFK, Senators William Proxmire and Everett Dirksen, and Milwaukee's own Mayor Henry Maier was now accompanied and sullied by an imposter the likes of Theodore. How could anyone get away with such behavior and still garner respect? Re-electable respect! A married man of stature cavorting with single girls, driving while intoxicated with an expired license, fleeing from a patrol car, failing to report an accident for nearly nine hours, and then conveniently lawyering up as the distinguished Senator was virtually given a pass by the inquisitive but ever reverent local constabulary. We later learned that he called the parents of Mary Jo Kopechne the following morning advising them of their daughter's passing never mentioning that, oh by the way, he was the one driving the "cahr."

Oh well, I'll get over it. It's just that as a young kid, I needed respectable and upstanding heroes to uphold my faith and belief that honesty, integrity, and hard work are all attainable and rewarding virtues worthy of defense at all costs. Instead, via Theodore, I've witnessed the rewards of deceit and dishonesty, debauchery, disrespect, elitism, the extreme exploitation of society's double standards, and the filthiness of posturing which has become somehow excused and exonerated while shrouded as simply "party politics."

As one could guess, I did not favor the Senator from Massachusetts as many do. The fawning media and the Democrat Party are quite a bit more forgiving. Rather, the fawning media and the Democrat Party are quite a bit more forgetful.

For an in depth analysis of Chappaquiddick, visit http://issuu.com/milwaukeeroad (or find the link "My PDF Library" in the right-hand column) and access a collection of pdf's featuring the stunningly revealing testimonial of Kennedy's personal attorney Joseph Gargan and his observations of that fateful night in July 1969. Gargan maintained a website at http://www.ytedk.com/ for many years only to see it recently under construction or removed. It was not a complimentary website towards Theodore though. So, that alone may indicate the efforts of one interested party obsessed in cleansing the internet of truthful Kennedy files. Just my own thought on that.

- milwaukeeroad


(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Feds: Stimulus money sent to 4,000 cons

Funds for Cons...Cash for Clunkers...and we are being told the government can run a healthcare program?!


(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Bush Quietly Saved a Million African Lives

If a Democratic Party president had done this, he would be feted as both a national hero and international hero on his way to a ceremony with the Nobel Committee. George W. Bush, however, is getting very little credit—or, at least, no fanfare. - by Dr. Paul Kengor


(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Friday, August 14, 2009

You Might Be a Birther if...


No tinfoil hats here. Kyle-Anne Shiver simply asks for a little proof, that's all. And, a legitimate response from a strangely incurious media. Some proof. Any proof. How about any of these for starters:

  • Panahou Academy school records, 5th through 12th grades
  • Occidental College records, including financial aid information.
  • Columbia University records, including the missing senior thesis and financial aid information.
  • Harvard University records, including information on how a student who never wrote anything (that can be found) was elected president of the prestigious law review, and including information on how Harvard Law School was afforded by humble community agitator, Barack Obama, or Barry Soetoro.
  • Obama's Illinois state senate records and papers, mysteriously lost.

No man or woman in this Country today could successfully apply for a high-level executive position with any corporation without submitting this meager documentation to prove the statements made in a job application. No president in the past 30 years has been permitted this level of secrecy about his life. Yet, today we have a sitting president who has provided none of it. In lieu of actual documents, the American public has a "narrative" created by PR guru, turned political operative, David Axelrod.

excerpted from Kyle-Anne Shiver - American Thinker


(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

10 Questions which need answers

Ten Questions Politicians Won’t Answer

From National Review by Tom Coburn - Senator from Oklahoma

While I have confidence in the American people to come up with their own probing questions, let me suggest a few questions that my own colleagues have been loath to answer:

1. Why do we need to increase spending on health care by at least $1.6 trillion and steal prosperity from our children and grandchildren when we spend nearly twice per person what other industrialized nations spend on health care?

In my view, any bill that increases spending is a failure and not serious reform. The problem is not that we don’t spend enough on health care, but that we don’t allocate resources efficiently and get value for what we pay.

2. What programs will you cut and whose taxes will you raise to pay for health-care reform?

Any politician — Republican or Democrat — who refuses to answer this question or avoids the topic by deferring to the committees of jurisdiction doesn’t deserve to be in office.

3. What earmarks or pet projects that you have sponsored will you sacrifice to help finance the cost of health-care reform?

It is immoral, in my view, to ask taxpayers to make more sacrifices while politicians practice business-as-usual pork-barrel politics.

4. Will you vote for a public option that requires taxpayer-funded abortion?

The current version of the so-called reform bill requires taxpayer-funded abortion. In the House, this fact prompted 19 pro-life Democrats to send a
letter of protest to Speaker Pelosi. In the Senate, an amendment by Barbara Mikulski (D., Md.) that would require taxpayer-funded abortion passed in committee. Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) objected and voted no, saying, “The way it [the Mikulski amendment] is written could be interpreted down the road to include something like abortion.” Are these Democrats also part of the right-wing scare-tactic conspiracy?

5. If the public option is so wonderful, will you lead by example and vote for a plan to enroll you and your family in the public option?

I offered an amendment in committee to force members of Congress to enroll in the public option. Nine out of eleven Democrats on the health committee who back the public option refused. If the politicians creating the public option don’t have confidence in it, neither should the American people.

6. Will you vote for a plan that will allow a board of politicians and bureaucrats to override decisions made by you and your doctor?

Both the Senate and House bills set up a government-run “comparative effectiveness” board that will make final decisions about treatment and care. In committee, I gave senators several opportunities to accept language that would forbid this board from denying care. All of my amendments were rejected, which suggests that the intent is to set up a board that will ration care, as is done in the United Kingdom.

7. If you support a “comparative effectiveness” board, what qualifies you, as a politician, to practice medicine? Have you delivered health care to a single person, much less entire classes of people you claim to represent, such as the poor, the uninsured, or children?

I’m one of two physicians in the Senate, along with John Barrasso of Wyoming. I know for a fact that very few leaders in this debate have any firsthand experience or knowledge of health care, which is disturbing.

8. How will a government-run public option perform better than other failing government programs, such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Indian Health Care?

Forty percent of doctors refuse to accept Medicaid patients because the program is broken. Access to a government program — such as the public option — does not guarantee access to health care.

9. If increasing spending on health care was the solution, why hasn’t it worked yet?

The public-option “reform” is not new at all but an extension of 1960s-era public policies that say a little more government spending and intervention is always the answer.

10. Are you more committed to doing reform right or quickly? Would you consider backing a thoughtful alternative to the public option? If so, which one?

I’ve introduced a bill along with Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) and Reps. Paul Ryan (R., Wisc.) and Devin Nunes (R., Calif.) called the
Patients Choice Act that guarantees coverage and choice for every American without raising taxes or increasing spending. In fact, our bill will save taxpayers at least $70 billion. Many other members of Congress, both Republicans and Democrats, are working on alternatives that don’t herd the American people into a government-run program.

The choice is not between the public option and nothing. The choice is between the public option and an option that can win the support of the public. The future of health care truly is up to you.

Dr. Tom Coburn (R.) is a U.S. senator from Oklahoma. (Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Open letter to the White House


Dearest Linda Douglass,

This is laughable. At http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Facts-Are-Stubborn-Things/ you directly request the public to respond:

If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to flag@whitehouse.gov.

OK. Since a representative like John Conyers publicly admits he hasn't even read the bill, and would require the assistance of a couple of lawyers to interpret the bill either way, how would I know what sounds fishy? If he's ignorant of what's in it, why should I rely on my government to adequately inform me? Hmmm? Our own majority members of congress are not intimately familiar with this massive boondoggle and therefore they are unworthy of our inquiry. That irresponsible representation alone directs me to seek alternative sources for information.

Now, you sit here and lie to me regarding your own plan to eliminate the private individual medical insurance market with government run health care and insist that false rumors abound? You're truly out of touch. And, you must be very naive and simple. Via your plan, the only folks who will NOT lose their private insurance coverage are members of Congress!

1,000 plus pages of government run trash. Dump it! You can keep your attempt at communism. There's not even a lick of tort reform in this hastily compiled garbage!

I will continue to seek out alternative views on this disastrous attempt at legislation for no other reason than that I cannot trust you or your president to be truthful. I'd be delusional to think otherwise.

Jeff Wahlen - Orlando



(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monday, August 3, 2009

I'm stickin' with the IBD...

The Investor's Business Daily gallantly continues the fight against the BarryCare government run elimination of the private medical insurance market despite all of the White House denials. I'm stickin' with the IBD for my truth, not Captain Barry!

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Is This Barry's Kenyan Cert?

Since the Congress has collectively chosen to accept some Hawaiian's verbal that she's seen Barry's stateside birth cert, I feel it is my patriotic duty to accept an attorney's claim that the cert in the above photo is the real birth certificate from Kenya. Makes sense to me. I'm OK with it too!

Like I've always said, all I ask of this president is not financial bailouts, free government run healthcare, or even a highly paid do-nothing, unaccountable assignment with ACORN. All I want is his birth certificate. That's all I ask.

A hat tip to both Orly and Joe! The principal responses oughta be marvelous! Interestingly, the Clinton campaign couldn't find such material leading up to the election. Of course, that same bunch couldn't find her Rose Law Firm billing records for two full years all the while under subpoena either.

Let's see how quickly Dan Rather weighs in on this one. If we find out it is a fabrication, I'll opt for this one as offical instead of that forgery sitting in the Hawaiian vaults.

(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Saturday, August 1, 2009

Pink Slip Model

Friday, July 31, 2009

This blog is rarely prone to humor but...



For your amusement, I thought I'd highlight this story from the Boston Globe. The laugh lines are numerous.

Kennedy Gets Highest Civilian Honor

by Foon Rhee, deputy national political editor July 30, 2009 02:48 PM

Senator Edward M. Kennedy received another high honor today, courtesy of President Obama.

The longtime Massachusetts senator is one of 16 recipients of the 2009 Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian honor. It is awarded to individuals who "make an especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public, or private endeavors," the White House said, and "this year’s awardees were chosen for their work as agents of change."

Kennedy issued a statement of thanks:

Kennedy -- who is battling brain cancer as Obama and Democrats in Congress try to push through the capstone of his 46-year Senate career, a healthcare overhaul -- said he was "profoundly grateful" to Obama.

“My life has been committed to the ideal of public service which President Kennedy wanted the Medal of Freedom to represent. To receive it from another President who prizes that same ideal of service and inspires so many to serve is a great privilege that moves me deeply,” Kennedy said in a statement.

UPDATE: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi congratulated Kennedy. "On behalf of all Members of Congress, I congratulate our friend and colleague, Senator Ted Kennedy," she said in a statement. "Few have accomplished more in a lifetime than Senator Kennedy has; this award -- the highest a civilian can receive - honors his steadfast commitment to the American ideal of justice."

Representative Edward Markey of Massachusetts also paid tribute to Kennedy. “The Presidential Medal of Freedom is a fitting tribute to Senator Kennedy," he said in a statement. "A man of enormous courage, Senator Kennedy is never afraid to ‘sail against the wind’ in the name of justice, equality and opportunity for all Americans. And that is why he is the greatest Senator in our country’s history."

Fellow Senator John F. Kerry of Massachusetts added his congrats. “As a legislator Ted Kennedy has surpassed even Daniel Webster, and now the Medal of Freedom rightly recognizes that he forever belongs in the company of recipients like his brother President John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr. and Nelson Mandela. You can’t think of the march of freedom in our time without recognizing and honoring what Ted has done for workers’ rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and human rights. He picked up his brothers’ burning commitment to civil rights and made it a cause of his life, and he is continuing that mission today in giving meaning to President Roosevelt’s faith in a freedom from fear so that no American family without health insurance will fear losing their home or lifesavings when illness strikes,” Kerry said in a statement.

Kennedy's award citation reads: "Senator Edward M. Kennedy has served in the United States Senate for forty-six years, and has been one of the greatest lawmakers – and leaders – of our time. From reforming our public schools to strengthening civil rights laws and supporting working Americans, Senator Kennedy has dedicated his career to fighting for equal opportunity, fairness and justice for all Americans. He has worked tirelessly to ensure that every American has access to quality and affordable health care, and has succeeded in doing so for countless children, seniors, and Americans with disabilities. He has called health care reform the “cause of his life,” and has championed nearly every health care bill enacted by Congress over the course of the last five decades. Known as the “Lion of the Senate,” Senator Kennedy is widely respected on both sides of the aisle for his commitment to progress and his ability to legislate."

Obama will present the medals, the first of his presidency, on Aug. 12. Other recipients include Nobel-winning physicist Stephen Hawking, former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the late congressman and housing secretary Jack Kemp, anti-apartheid leader Desmond Tutu, tennis legend and activist Billie Jean King, civil rights leaders Joseph Lowery, gay rights pioneer Harvey Milk, and actors Sidney Poitier and Chita Rivera.

“These outstanding men and women represent an incredible diversity of backgrounds. Their tremendous accomplishments span fields from science to sports, from fine arts to foreign affairs. Yet they share one overarching trait: Each has been an agent of change. Each saw an imperfect world and set about improving it, often overcoming great obstacles along the way," he said in a statement.

“Their relentless devotion to breaking down barriers and lifting up their fellow citizens sets a standard to which we all should strive. It is my great honor to award them the Medal of Freedom.”


(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

So it's two "r's" now?

BORN IN THE USA?
Hawaii health official: Trust me
'Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen'


© 2009 WorldNetDaily


Chiyome Fukino, director of Hawaii Department of Health

In another carefully worded statement, Hawaii's health director claimed today to have seen "original vital records" that prove "Barrack [sic] Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen."

Chiyome Fukino issued the brief statement in response to the rising chorus of concern across the country about Obama's failure to release a copy of his long-form birth certificate that would reveal the hospital in which he was born, the attending physician and other pertinent details.

"I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago ... "

Read the entire statement in which the president's first name was misspelled and no mention was made of the specific document reviewed. But, we should simply trust her, right? Kinda like in the spirit of Dan Rather and his forged documents?

The White House has refused to acknowledge repeated requests from WND that Obama authorize the Hawaii DOH to release all his birth records, including his original long-form birth certificate.

WND also has reported Obama has not released his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.

WND also has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

In addition, the question over Obama's eligibility is being raised on billboards nationwide.

The billboard campaign follows an ongoing petition campaign launched several months ago by WND Editor and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Farah.


(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Monday, July 27, 2009

Popular Homeowner Yard Sign

Dems say we can't call it "Government Run Healthcare."


Dems say "Republicans cannot call it 'Government Run Healthcare.' You can't. You just can't. We object. So, we're canceling your postal privileges as well!"

In other words, congressional members are not allowed to advise their constituency of impending legislation. Reminds me of censorship. Doesn't it to you?

(Click on bold headline for complete story)
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Aw Nuts!

So, we find out ACORN may be rancid? And they're in line to receive more than $8 billion in stimulus funding? Preposterous doesn't begin to cover it. Again, we have the Kenyan to thank for this!

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Looks like Waxman's the liar now!


After accusing the Investor's Business Daily of erroneous reporting (see the previous blog) concerning the illegality of future private medical insurance coverage, it appears that, in actuality, Hank Waxman is the liar.

(And, if you thought Waxman to be a bit diminutive, the twin towers astride Hank in the photo are each only 5'9" tall.)

(Click on bold headline for complete story)

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Private Medical Insurance Will Be Illegal

Wow! Thanks to IBD and their staff to uncover this one. They didn't have to go far to find it either...just 16 pages into it to be exact.

"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law.

(Click on bold headline for complete story)